引用本文:
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1043次   下载 339 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
中国第三人撤销之诉制度探析——对新《民事诉讼法》第56条第3款之解读
陈杰
(华东政法大学 研究生教育院,上海 200042)
摘要:
中国新实施的《民事诉讼法》增加了第三人撤销之诉制度,意在加强对民事诉讼中侵犯第三人合法权益行为的法律规制。《民事诉讼法》修改之前,中国对第三人合法权益的保护主要通过第三人参加诉讼制度、执行程序中的案外人异议制度以及案外第三人申请再审制度等进行,但这些制度都存在相应问题。本次新增的第三人撤销之诉制度于第三人权益保护上有诸多亮点,例如扩大了保护主体、衔接了事前保障程序及明确了提起事由等,但也存在着制度瑕疵、缺乏相应配套制度及与相关制度界限不明等问题。第三人撤销之诉制度的良好运行还需要通过完善制度构建、协调配套规定等对策进行。
关键词:  第三人撤销之诉  虚假诉讼  事后保障程序  第三人权益保护
DOI:
分类号:D925.1
基金项目:
On the System of the Third Party Discharging the Judgment of China: An Analysis of the Article 56 Item 3 of the New Civil Procedure Law
CHEN Jie
(Graduate School, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China)
Abstract:
In reality there are massive acts such as fraud litigations, malicious litigations and vicious conciliations, which seriously infringe the legitimate rights and interests of the third parties. The previous Civil Procedure Law had certain systems regulating such phenomenon but resulted poorly on account of some reasons. The new Civil Procedure Law establishes the system of the third party discharging the judgment aiming to enhance the regulation of acts of infringing the legitimate rights and interests of the third parties. It is very necessary to analysis the concrete structure of the system in order to find some defect and present corresponding countermeasure and suggestion based on the comparison between the previous system and the new one and the reference of foreign legislations.
Key words:  the third party discharging the Judgment  fraud litigations  malicious litigations  the protection of the rights and interests of the third party