引用本文:
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 3717次   下载 1186 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
刑事诉讼法之类推适用
周茂雄1,张宏2
(1.福建警察学院 科研处,福建 福州 350007;2.福建省尤溪县人民法院,福建 尤溪 365100)
摘要:
刑法上类推适用禁止原则源于罪刑法定原则,是为了保障公民不受国家恣意的刑罚制裁。刑事诉讼法不同于刑法,其类推具有容许性,也具有必要性。为了防止司法机关“曲意释法”,应当从外部和内部对类推适用加以制约。在刑事诉讼中进行类推适用时,首先要确定是否为开放性的法律漏洞,其次是探求与需要类推的案件具有类似性的法规,最后在此基础上对类推适用进行价值权衡,以确保类推适用的妥当。
关键词:  刑事诉讼法  类推适用  界限  开放性的法律漏洞  类似性  价值权衡
DOI:
分类号:D925
基金项目:
On the Analogy Principle in Criminal Procedure Law
ZHOU Maoxiong1, ZHANG Hong2
(1.Scientific Research Department, Fujian Police College, Fuzhou,Fujian 350007, China;2.People 's Court of Youxi County, Youxi, Fujian 365100, China)
Abstract:
The principle of analogy prohibited on criminal law arises from the principle of legally prescribed punishment for the purpose of protecting the people from wanton criminal penalties. Different from Criminal Law, the analogy of the criminal procedure law is admissible and necessary. To prevent the judicial authority from interpreting the law against the legislation intention, restrictions shall be set on the application of analogy from both the inside and outside. When performing analogy in the criminal procedure, the first thing is to confirm if the legal loophole has openness, the second is to explore the rule which has similarities to the case that needs analogy, and the last is to weigh the value of application to ensure that the application of the analogy is appropriate.
Key words:  criminal procedure law  analogy  limit  legal loopholes  similarity  value balance