引用本文:
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1149次   下载 600 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
合理抑或合乎情理——论罗尔斯对实践理性的结构性诠释及其困境
张祖辽,王雷雨
(江南大学 马克思主义学院,江苏 无锡 214122)
摘要:
罗尔斯将实践理性结构性地区分为实践的合理性和实践的合情理性。这一诠释不但为当代政治哲学提供了推理依据,也为传统契约论引入新的诠释路径。该诠释认为,霍布斯所构造的利益契约能够成立的根本原因是合理性优先于合情理性的实践推理结构,罗尔斯则通过对霍布斯式实践推理的结构性倒转为两个正义原则重新提供了新的证成依据,但罗尔斯对两个正义原则的先行认肯则使其理论陷入循环论证。
关键词:  合理性  合情理性  霍布斯  康德  罗尔斯
DOI:
分类号:D0-02
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(16YJC720029)
From the Rational to the Reasonable:A Study of John Rawls Structuralized Interpretation to Practical Reason
ZHANG Zuliao,WANG Leiyu
(School of Marxism, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214122, China)
Abstract:
Rawls distinguished practical reason into rationality and reasonableness. Such an interpretation both provided reasoning basis for modern political philosophy and introduced new interpretation way into traditional contract theory. It holds the view that Hobbes contract theory is due to the structure that the rational is prior to the reasonable while Rawls contract theory is due to a correspondingly reversed structure. By this new structure, Rawls provided a new method for the justification of the two justice principles, but Rawls theory ended as a vicious circle because of his affirmation to the two principles in advance.
Key words:  the rational  the reasonable  Hobbes  Kant  John Rawls