| 摘要: |
| 国内外关于马克思哲学思想发展的五大解读模式的关键区别,是源于对《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中所体现出的建立在异化劳动概念基础上的异化史观在唯物史观形成过程中的地位上的理解。《1844 年经济学哲学手稿》是马克思的思想从不成熟到成熟之间的一部著作,在其中,人本主义异化逻辑与从客观经济现实出发的科学逻辑交织在一起,前者占主导地位,但后者开辟了通向唯物史观的道路。 |
| 关键词: 《1844 年经济学哲学手稿》 马克思哲学 解读模式 唯物史观 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号:B0-0 |
| 文献标识码:A |
| 基金项目:中国石油大学(北京)2013 年度“研究生教育质量与创新工程冶项目 |
|
| The Status of Manuscript of Economics and Philosophy in 1844 in the Formation of Historical Materialism |
|
LI Weihong
|
|
School of Marxism, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
|
| Abstract: |
| International and domestic theorists‘studies on the development of Marx’s philosophy have formed five interpreting modes.Among the five modes, the key difference stems from different understanding to status of the alienated conception of history that is embodied in Manuscript of Economics and Philosophy in 1844(shortened as Manuscript) and established on the concept of alienated labor in the formation of historical materialism. Manuscript is the work that is in the process of Marx‘s thoughts from immaturity to maturity. In this work, the humanistic alienation logic intertwines with the science logic from objective economic reality; the former plays a dominant role and the latter opens the way to historical materialism. |
| Key words: Manuscript of Economics and Philosophy in 1844 Marx謖s philosophy interpreting mode historical materialism |
