| 摘要: |
| 由于传统司法拍卖带来了各种问题,司法拍卖网络化改革的呼声高涨,各地都进行了积极的探索。上海的网拍平台仍以拍卖公司为主体,属于“改良派”;重庆引入产权交易机构,与法院实为公法上的委托合同关系,属于“改革派”;而浙江、江苏的淘宝网模式完全以法院作为拍卖主体,是当之无愧的“革命派”。在现有制度设计的基础上,解构各种模式中关系主体之间的法律关系,并充实相关的责任承担的制度设计,具有积极的理论和实践探索意义。 |
| 关键词: 网络 司法拍卖 责任承担 模式 类型化 |
| DOI：10.13216/j.cnki.upcjess.2015.02.0010 |
| 分类号:D926;F49 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| The Type Research of Online Judicial Auction Model |
|
GAO Yingjia
|
|
(Kenneth Wang School of Law,Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006, China)
|
| Abstract: |
| As the traditional judicial auction brings various problems, the high call for the network reform of judicial auction, the courts have made some active explorations throughout the country. Shanghai 'sonline auction platform still treats auction company as the main body, belonging to the "reformists"; Chongqing introduced property right transaction institution whichrelationship with the court is actually a contract relationshipin public law, belonging to "innovationists"; Zhejiang 's andJiangsu 's Taobao model which entirely treats court as the main body, is worthy of "revolutionaries". On the basis of the current system design, to deconstruct their relationship with the courts and the relevant parties from the theory, system design and enrich the related responsibility, has positive theoretical and practical exploration significance. |
| Key words: network judicial auction responsibility model type research |
