| 摘要: |
| 黄震是南宋末年一位博学通儒,其为学反对空言心性,主张躬行实践。其主张体现在治《春秋》上,即将《春秋》视作史书,反对《春秋》学上的褒贬凡例之说,力图以史事为根据来注解《春秋》,反对没有根据的臆度和猜测;在《春秋》经传关系上,绝对信经疑传,但又反对时人将“三传”束之高阁,而是有所取舍,并且尤重《左传》;重视训诂之学,反对空言《春秋》大义,尤其注重结合社会现实阐发《春秋》经义,具有鲜明的时代特色。 |
| 关键词: 黄震 《春秋》 “三传” |
| DOI：10.13216/j.cnki.upcjess.2019.01.0009 |
| 分类号:K245 |
| 基金项目:中国石油大学(华东)自主创新项目(R1711016B) |
|
| On Huang Zhen 's Thought About The Spring and Autumn Annals |
|
MA Lili
|
|
(College of Arts, China University of Petroleum(East China),Qingdao,Shandong 266580, China)
|
| Abstract: |
| Huang Zhen was a scholar of profound learning living in the end of the Song Dynasty. In the empty academic atmosphere, Huang Zhen insisted on studying for applying in practice. He took The Spring and Autumn Annals as a historical book, instead of a book of complimentary and critical commentaries. He tried to annotate The Spring and Autumn Annals on historical facts and opposed the unfounded assumptions and speculations. In the relationship of the book of the Annals and the commentaries on it, Huang Zhen absolutely believed the book and doubted the Commentaries. But he was against putting the three commentary books on the shelf and advocated having some choices. He paid special attention to Zuo Zhuan(Zuo 's Commentary). Huang Zhen emphasized on exegesis and opposed pedant talks of the principles of the Annals. In particular, he paid attention to reinterpreting the Annals with the social reality. His studies had distinctive characteristics of the times. |
| Key words: Huang Zhen The Spring and Autumn Annals the Three Commentaries |
