| 摘要: |
| 德性荣誉观在亚里士多德和托马斯·阿奎那的思想中占有重要的地位,而托马斯·阿奎那的德性荣誉观又是对亚里士多德的继承与发展。所以,二者德性荣誉观同中有异、异中有同。具体来说,他们都肯定了德性与荣誉的联系,但对德性内涵、类型以及指向的理解有所不同;都有自己的荣誉域及荣誉准则,但是因受社会历史条件制约而存在差异;都主张德性荣誉获取的内在性,但托马斯·阿奎那 进一步要求德性荣誉获取的外在性。对二者德性荣誉观的内涵、荣誉域、荣誉准则以及获取途径的比较,一方面使得我们对德性荣誉观的认识更为系统化和科学化,另一方面也有助于纠正现代荣誉观发展过程中面临的被狭隘化和被边缘化倾向,为现代荣誉观的健康良性发展提供一些有益的启示。 |
| 关键词: 亚里士多德 托马斯·阿奎那 德性荣誉观 现代荣誉观 |
| DOI：10.13216/j.cnki.upcjess.2019.02.0010 |
| 分类号:B822 |
| 基金项目:2017年江苏省研究生科研创新计划(KYCX17-0547);国家社会科学基金项目(17BZX091) |
|
| A Comparative Study of the Views of Virtuous Honor Between Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas |
|
YANG Guangyue, ZHOU Shilu
|
|
(1.College of Marxism, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China;2.College of Humanities, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)
|
| Abstract: |
| The Views of Virtuous Honor play an important role in the thoughts of Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas. Thomas Aquinas inherits and develops Aristotle 's Views of Virtuous Honor. Therefore, they have both similarities and differences. They all affirmed the connection between virtue and honor, but differed in the understanding of moral connotation, type and orientation. Both had their own honor field and honor criteria, but they were subject to differences in historical conditions.All advocate the use of rational and appropriate principles to obtain virtuous honor, but the latter emphasizes more on the faith of God. Through the comparison of the connotation, honor field, honor criteria and access route between the two Views of Virtuous Honor, on the one hand, our understanding of the Views of Virtuous Honor is more systematic and scientific, on the other hand, it also helps to correct the narrowing and marginalization tendency facing the development of modern honor outlook and provides some enlightenment to the healthy and sound development of modern honor outlook. |
| Key words: Aristotle Thomas Aquinas the Views of Virtuous Honor diversity of values |
