引用本文:
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 932次   下载 317 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
霍耐特承认理论的发展与超越——基于阿多诺非同一性思维的基本特征
王慧楠,汤俪瑾
(中国科学技术大学 马克思主义学院,安徽 合肥 230026)
摘要:
霍耐特基于阿多诺的非同一性思维提出“为承认而斗争”的理论,其内涵包括“爱、法律、团结”三种承认形式和“强暴、剥夺权利、侮辱”三种蔑视形式。霍耐特承认理论与阿多诺非同一性思维有着密不可分的联系,承认理论对非同一性思维,首先完成了社会批判到政治伦理批判、从异质性到同质性、从绝对否定到相对否定的发展,然后又从解决路径和物化概念上实现了从艺术之路到承认之路、从客体优先到主体优先的超越路径。探寻二者之间的关系,可使承认理论在新时代条件下发挥更大的现实意义和实践价值。
关键词:  承认理论  非同一性  蔑视  超越
DOI:10.13216/j.cnki.upcjess.2019.04.0009
分类号:B089.1
基金项目:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(WK2111070006)
The Development and Transcendence of Honet 's Recognition Theory: Based on Basic Characteristics of Adorno 's Non-identity Thinking
WANG Huinan, TANG Lijin
(School of Marxism,University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei, Anhui 230026,China)
Abstract:
Honet put forward the theory of "struggle for recognition" based on Adorno 's non-identity thinking, which includes three forms of recognition, i.e.,"love, law and solidarity", and three forms of contempt, i.e., "rape, deprivation of rights and insult". Honet 's recognition theory has intimate contact to Adorno 's non-identity thinking.First, it completed a development from social criticism to the political and ethical criticism, from heterogeneity to homogeneity and from the absolute negation to the relative negation. And then, from the solution path and the concept of materialization, it realized a transcendence from the road of art to recognition and from object to subject preference. It is necessary to explore the relationship between the two so that the recognition theory can have more practical significance and values in the new era.
Key words:  recognition theory  non-identity  contempt  transcendence