引用本文:
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 2592次   下载 1073 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
黑格尔与福山:从为承认而斗争到历史的终结
吴江
(清华大学 社会科学学院,北京 100084)
摘要:
自《历史的终结及最后之人》出版至今,福山的思想(包括其反民主观点)并未发生本质改变。对于所谓资本主义意识形态的胜利,他不但从未欢呼,反而深感忧虑。福山在三个方面误读了他所依赖的黑格尔哲学:首先,福山将主奴关系中应被扬弃的要素看作是优越之人的特征。其次,他未区分生存状态上的可能性与存在论-生存论的可能性。这种混淆造成的后果是,一方面使他混淆了不同种类的承认,另一方面使他错误地认为历史必有一个时间性终点,即他对黑格尔哲学的第三个误读。尽管如此,人们仍应看到福山思想的当代价值。
关键词:  福山  黑格尔  主奴关系  历史终结论  历史的终结  民主
DOI:10.13216/j.cnki.upcjess.2015.06.0009
分类号:D0-02
基金项目:
Hegel and Fukuyama:From the Struggle for Recognition to the End of History
WU Jiang
(School of Social Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)
Abstract:
Francis Fukuyama 's thought (including his anti-democratic view) has experienced little change since the publication of The End of History and the Last Man. Fukuyama worries about the so-called victory of capitalism rather than hails it. Fukuyama misunderstands Hegelian philosophy in that first, he takes as adorable characteristics of the superior what should be sublated in the lord-slave relation. Second, he does not differentiate the existential from the existential to the ontological; as a result, he confounds different kinds of recognition. Third, in Fukuyama 's (mis)understanding, the Hegelian philosophy embraces an end of history. However, Fukuyama 's "end of history" is still valuable for us today.
Key words:  Francis Fukuyama  Hegel  lord-slave relation  theory of the end of history  the end of history  democracy