| 摘要: |
| 类型化思维是一种弥补抽象概念式思维弊端并逐渐取而代之的思维模式,其具有思考维度双向性、归类依据价值性、判断标准模糊性的特点。类型化思维在司法实践领域中的运用主要体现在两个方面,即类型化解释与对法律适用机制的重新理解。由于《刑法》分则中规定有“胁迫”一词的条文多且具体内涵各不一样,因此对《刑法》分则中“胁迫”的理解是研究类型化思维司法运用的绝佳范例,有利于更好地阐释类型化思维的特点与优势。 |
| 关键词: 类型化思维 类型化解释 法律适用机制 胁迫 |
| DOI：10.13216/j.cnki.upcjess.2017.03.0009 |
| 分类号:D914 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Judicial Application of Category Thinking ——A Case Study of "Duress" in Specific Provisions of Criminal Law |
|
HUANG Chenchen
|
|
(Criminal Justice College, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China)
|
| Abstract: |
| Category thinking is a thinking model which makes up the disadvantages of concept thinking and gradually replaces concept thinking. It has many characteristics, such as two-way thinking dimension, valuable classification basis and fuzzy judgment criterion. Judicial application of category thinking is mainly reflected in two aspects, i.e., category explanation and re-interpretation of law applicable mechanism. For the reason that many clauses in specific provisions of Criminal Law stipulate "duress" and their meanings are different, understanding of "duress" is the superexcellent example for the research of judicial application of category thinking and helps expound the advantages of category thinking better. |
| Key words: category thinking category explanation law applicable mechanism duress |
