| 摘要: |
| 程序的简化某种程度上意味着权利的减损,被告人的自主选择具有重要意义。从立法现状来看,被告人的刑事程序选择主要存在速裁程序、简易程序及普通程序简化审三种。但从运行情况来看,却形成实体程序相混同、适用标准粗疏化、审查方式形式化及律师帮助未明确的制度困境。域外制度经验为中国问题的解决提供了基本规律的参考。为有效保障被告人权利,刑事程序简化机制需要重申被告人的程序性主体地位,设定综合性的适用标准,引入层次化的审查方式,配套常态化的律师帮助,借以保障被告人的自主选择。 |
| 关键词: 程序简化 程序选择 被告人 自愿性 |
| DOI：10.13216/j.cnki.upcjess.2018.05.0008 |
| 分类号:D915.18 |
| 基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目(16BFX078) |
|
| On the Defendants Choice of Criminal Procedure Simplification:Dilemma and Solution |
|
WANG Ruijian
|
|
(College for Criminal Law Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875,China)
|
| Abstract: |
| The simplification of the procedure means the decline of rights, and the defendant 's own choice is of great significance. Based on the status quo of the legislation, the defendant 's choice of criminal procedure mainly lies in the selection of fast-track procedures, simplified procedures and general procedures for simplified examination. However, from the operating situation, it has formed a dilemma, in which the entity and procedures are mixed, the application standard is rough, the review methods are formalized, and the right to counsel is not clearly identified. Extraterritorial institutional experience provides a reference to the base for the solution of China 's problems. In order to effectively protect the defendant 's rights, the criminal procedure simplification mechanism needs to reiterate the defendant 's procedural main body status, set comprehensive application standards, introduce a layered review method, and be assisted with normalized lawyers, so as to protect the defendant 's self-selection. |
| Key words: procedural simplification procedure selection defendant voluntary |
