引用本文:
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1961次   下载 994 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
网络环境下个人数据侵权纠纷的民事司法保护
王媛媛
(北京航空航天大学 法学院,北京 100191)
摘要:
网络的发展和普及对个人数据造成威胁,实践中个人数据被泄露、买卖、非法收集和使用的现象频发,也由此引发了相关的诉讼问题。个人数据本身的复合性特征使得相关侵权行为呈现出刑民、行民诉讼交叉现象,且案件审理过程中涉及大量的电子证据问题。然而,由于实体法落后、被告不易确定、管辖不明、电子证据的不稳定性和技术依赖性给个人数据民事司法保护带来一系列难题。因此,有必要运用诉的利益理论扩大个人数据保护受案范围、确立信息控制主体责任制度、实行个人数据纠纷专属管辖制度、构建电子证据运用及审查的特殊规则。
关键词:  个人数据  民事司法保护  受案范围  管辖制度  电子证据
DOI:10.13216/j.cnki.upcjess.2020.01.0012
分类号:DF71
基金项目:司法部2017年度国家法治与法学理论研究项目(17SFB2023)
On the Protection of Personal Data in Civil Procedure under the Network Environment
WANG Yuanyuan
(School of Law, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100191, China)
Abstract:
The development and popularization of network pose a threat to the protection of personal data.Personal data are frequently leaked, bought and sold, and illegally collected and used,resulting inlitigation issues.Due to the complexity of personal data, the infringement of personal data involves both criminal and civil litigation and a large number of electronic evidence problems are involved in the trial.However, the backward substantive law, the difficulty of defendant determination, the unclear of the jurisdiction,the instability of electronic evidence and the dependence of technology have brought a series of difficulties to the civil judicial protection of personal data.Therefore, it is necessary to use the interest theory of litigation to expand the scope of personal data protection cases, establish the responsibility system of information control subjects, implement the exclusive jurisdiction system of intellectual property courts and internet courtsand establish independent evidence preservation procedures.
Key words:  personal data  civil judicial protection  case accepting scope  jurisdiction  electronic evidence