引用本文:
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 908次   下载 405 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
中国法院经费保障体制改革研究
孙增芹1,燕华然2
(1.中国石油大学 人文社会科学学院,山东 东营 257061;2.东营市东营区人民法院,山东 东营 257000)
摘要:
中国法院经费保障体制经历了诉讼费用“坐收坐支”和“收支两条线”确立、落实、改革四个阶段。现行法院经费保障体制已经成为制约审判职能充分发挥的重要因素,表现在法院办公、办案经费不足,法官不独立,司法权力地方化等。理论界对改革和完善法院经费保障体制主要设计了中央与省级统筹“双轨制”和完全的中央统筹两种方案。在考察与借鉴国外成功立法的基础上,结合中国的具体实践,总体实行中央与省级统筹“双轨制”,再配合各项具体制度以弥补理论界方案的不足,将省级财政作为中央与县市财政的一个“对接点”,是一种可行的方案。
关键词:  司法改革  法院  经费保障
DOI:
分类号:D926.2
基金项目:
A Study of Court Funds Guarantee System Reform in China
SUN Zengqin1, YAN Huaran2
(1.School of Humanities and Social Sciences, China University of Petroleum, Dongying, Shandong 257061, China;2.Dongying District People 's Court, Dongying, Shandong 257000, China)
Abstract:
China 's courts funds guarantee system experienced a litigation cost "to obtain and use funds without authorization", "separation between revenue and expenditure" establishment, implementation and reform stages. The current court funds guarantee system is an important factor that judicial function can 't give full play to its role. For example, the court office and casehandling funds are insufficient, judges are not independent completely, and judicial power is localized, etc. Theoretical circles mainly design two solutions, "doubletrack system" that means the central and provincial plan as a whole and complete central plan as a whole. On the basis of experiences of other countries successful legislation, the author suggests a plan combining our country 's concrete practice. The plan is the central and provincial plan as a whole and many specific systems, which can make up the shortage of the above theoretical solution, coupled with. It 's necessary that provincial finance become a joint between central finance and city / town finance. Our aim is to build a longterm mechanism of court funds guarantee system.
Key words:  judicial reform  court  funds guarantee