| 摘要: |
| 在民事纠纷中,鉴定意见出现的频率颇高;鉴定意见由于其科学性和专业性,通常是审判的重要参考甚至是依据,常人难以通过经验和一般知识对其内容进行分析,因此鉴定意见的质证显得尤为重要。实践中鉴定意见所包含的典型的程序性问题主要有鉴定程序的启动、鉴定材料质证与取样和鉴定人的出庭。程序问题的审查要点分为程序问题是否属于程序瑕疵、违反何种法律规范、采取是否会影响鉴定意见的真实性、是否严重侵害了公共利益及当事人的实质性诉讼权利。为了应对“诉讼爆炸”与司法资源严重不足的矛盾,法院需要在公正与效率之间作出平衡选择。通过严格限制法院的自由裁量权,加强裁判文书的说理,保障当事人上诉、申请再审等寻求救济的途径,在维护最低限度诉讼公正的前提下提升诉讼效率。 |
| 关键词: 民事鉴定意见 程序问题 审查 反思 |
| DOI：10.13216/j.cnki.upcjess.2019.02.0006 |
| 分类号:D925.1 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Status,Procedural Problems and Review Points of Civil Expert Opinions: A Case Study of Several Typical IP Cases |
|
MEI Yushan
|
|
(Law School, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)
|
| Abstract: |
| In civil disputes, expert opinions appear frequently. For its scientific and professional nature, expert opinion is usually the important reference and even the basis for trial. Expert opinion cannot be analyzed by experience and general knowledge, thus its cross-examination is particularly important. The typical procedural problems of expert opinion in practice mainly include the commencement of procedures, the expertise materials and the necessity of expert 's appearance in court. The review points of procedural problems include:whether procedural problems belong to procedural defects;what legal norms are violated;whether the adoption of legal norms will affect the authenticity of expert opinions; whether they seriously violate public interests and the substantive litigation rights of the parties. In order to alleviate the contradiction between the explosion of litigation and the serious shortage of judicial resources, the courts need to make a balanced choice between justice and efficiency. On the premise of maintaining the minimum justice of litigation, the courts also need to improve the efficiency of litigation by strictly restricting the court 's discretion, strengthening the reasoning of judicial documents, guaranteeing the parties appeal, applying for retrial and other ways of seeking relief. |
| Key words: civil expert opinions procedural problem review reflection ① 参见广东省高级人民法院〔2016〕粤民终1093号民事判决书。 |
