| 摘要: |
| 毛泽东提出“马克思主义中国化”这个用语以后,为什么又几乎不再使用它?近些年来,国内学术界对此进行了研究和探讨,形成了诸如“外部原因说”、“不准确说”、“被动选择与主动考虑说”、“历史语境说”等几种有代表性的观点。这些观点大致分为两种主张:一种认为是毛泽东本人放弃了这一提法,今天应当少用或者不用;另一种认为毛泽东的修改只是一种变通,实质意义没有改变,新时期恢复“马克思主义中国化”的提法是理论创新和实践创新的需要。尽管在观点和主张上有明显分歧,但上述多数研究者也存在某种比较一致的看法,即认为与“马克思列宁主义的理论和中国革命的实践相结合”这样的提法相比较,“马克思主义中国化”的提法不够“精确”。总体来看,研究的视角不断扩展和延伸,日益走向具体和多样;同时也有需要进一步深化研究或者反思的问题。 |
| 关键词: 毛泽东 马克思主义中国化 改变 原因 述评 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号:A84 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Commentary on the Reasons That Mao Zedong Changed the Formulation of "Sinicization of Marxism" |
|
FENG Laigui
|
|
(College of Marxism, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan, Shandong 250014, China)
|
| Abstract: |
| Why did Mao Zedong almost no longer use it after he proposed "the Sinicization of Marxism"? In recent years, domestic researchers have been making researches and discussion on it, having formed several representative views such as "external reasons", "inaccurate", "passive choice and initiative consideration", "historical language environment" etc. These views can be roughly divided into two propositions:One is that Mao Zedong himself abandoned this formulation, and today we should use it with caution, use it seldom, or don 't use it; another is that the modification is Mao Zedong 's adaptation on strategy, without any change in substantial meaning, and it is the needs of the theoretical innovation and practical innovation in the new period that we resume "Sinicization of Marxism". Despite the obvious differences in the views and propositions, most researchers mentioned above also have a rather consistent opinion that "Sinicization of Marxism" is not "accurate" if comparing it with the wording "integrating the theory of Marxism-Leninism with the practice of the Chinese revolution". Overall, the perspective of research is continuing to expand and extend, growing increasingly specific and diverse, meanwhile there are some questions needing to research or reflect further deeply. |
| Key words: Sinicization of Marxism change reasons commentary |
